The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the regulation laid down because of the Supreme Court from the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Consequently, the competent authority on the parent department in the petitioner as well as the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority on the respondent is additionally directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits on the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment about the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that even though the crime of murder was proven, the offender had a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case set a precedent for looking at mitigating factors during sentencing.
12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is really a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service is definitely the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to try and do away with the candidature of the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 days for that department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we're guided by the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main get more info case, it is also a very well-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
seventy three . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Bearing on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 with the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not really served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice is often a mandatory need along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation calls for that a grievance notice be served around the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) If your organization is transprovincial.
six. Mere involvement within a heinous offence is not any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled to the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, since then He's behind the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person is no more required for further investigation, therefore, his constant incarceration would not serve any helpful purpose at this stage.
Online access for the case management system for your Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases could possibly be searched using name or case number.
I) The above mentioned referred case FIR, for your murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered to the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who's father with the petitioner and as per story of FIR, the petitioner is really an eyewkness of the event.
The DCFS social worker in charge on the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-thirty day period report to the court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Regardless of its popularity, very few may perhaps know about its intricacies. This article is undoubtedly an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section plus the incredibly small threshold that governs it.
147 . Const. P. 479/2019 (D.B.) Waheed Akhtar V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi The petition regarding the upgraded post and shell out fixation will not be entertainable for your reasons that this sort of matters are typically handled by administrative or service tribunals, and the legal grounds for this petition are insufficient as a result this petition is dismissed, which will involve disputed claims and counterclaims on the topic post, therefore this court is not really in the position to dilate upon such disputes in constitutional jurisdiction. Read more
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory law, which are proven by executive businesses based on statutes.